In the August 09 edition of WineLand, I did a story questioning the role of
competition and accolade stickers on wine bottles. This followed after reports that some international importers requested wineries to remove local competition stickers from their wines – arguing that, besides certain international awards, these glitzy decorations are only confusing consumers.
The major value associated with the role of competitions and the uncertainty of the legitimacy of their outcome has since then again been questioned by two separate marketing research reports – one local and one from the US.
An MBA project by Christiane von Armin, carried out at the University of Stellenbosch Business School (USB), shows that the notable increase in the number of South African wine competitions has watered down the impact of their awards and accolades.
According to Christiane, consumers have also become skeptical about the honesty of some wineries in using awards for marketing wines, while the competition organisers are often the ones cashing in on winemakers’ attempts to increase the prestige of their wines through accolades. The report states that “the abundance of competitions has gradually given rise to doubt, with critics increasingly questioning whether these awards carry the same weight.”
An online survey was conducted among a total of 285 South African consumers by means of a questionnaire. This revealed that variety, vintage, region, producer and packaging all play a bigger role when choosing a wine than awards. On a scale from 1 (not important) to 5 (very important), the latter only rated 2.97, with variety being the most important factor at 4.14.
The majority of these consumers (68%) agreed that the increasing number of wine awards is confusing.
Christiane’s report boldly concludes: “Perhaps the industry should take steps to avoid a nasty hangover from overindulgence in competitions and awards – and worse marketers’ fake awards that cheapen the concept.”
To further deepen the concern surrounding the “cheap concept” of competitions, an American study by Robert Hodgson found that there is very little concordance among competitions in awarding gold medals.
This study was published in the Le Bulletin de L’OIV, the international wine organisation’s technical and research report.
In this report an analysis of over 4 000 wines entered in 13 US wine competitions, showed why winemakers often refer to competitions as “wine lotteries”. Of the 2 440 wines that entered in more than three competitions, 47 received gold medals, but 84% of these exact wines also won zilch at another competition.
This report concludes that “the probability of winning a gold medal at one competition is stochastically independent of the probability of receiving gold at another competition, indicating that winning a Gold medal is greatly influenced by chance.”
According to Christiane, with producers being under pressure from diminishing profit margins, “it is more crucial than ever for wineries to achieve the optimal blend in their marketing mix.”
Maybe this mix, entails more effort in hand to hand sales, label (and not sticker) presentation, expanding to new markets and even new green initiatives – while being more selective when entering a competition.
And if you’re really desperate, don’t cheat by entering small batches at competitions – just enter the lotto. That’s also decided by chance!


Recent Comments